Illustrative starting funds: $9,784.00. Illustrative ending balance: $165,233.11. The ending figure adds $155,449.11 of modeled net P&L to that assumed starting balance. There is no compounding or assumed additional deposit.

The first archived entry price is $91,485.55 per BTC. At 40×, the 0.5 BTC base requires approximately $1,143.57 of initial margin using that price as a proxy for the mark price. The first selected trade has a sizing boost, so a 0.5 BTC base opens 2 BTC: approximately $4,574.28 of initial margin, before fees. Its equal add brings the position to 4 BTC and approximately $9,173.56 of initial margin at the add price.

Including modeled entry/add fees and the unrealized loss at that first add gives $9,783.49, rounded up to $9,784.00. We checked initial-margin funding at every recorded entry and add; the first add is the largest requirement after prior modeled profits and losses.

This is a capital illustration, not a validated funded Hyperliquid backtest or a recommended deposit. It assumes cross margin and archived spot-proxy fill prices. Historical exchange mark prices, maintenance-margin tiers, reserve buffers, funding, slippage and liquidation behavior were not replayed. Those can change required capital and whether all modeled trades are possible. Hyperliquid margin calculation ↗

Grouped by final exit time in New York. First and last months are partial. Net values include the modeled 0.03% fee per fill; funding and slippage are excluded. Rounded monthly values may differ slightly from the unrounded total.

Source: the archived 288-position ledger for the selected V9 revision. Evaluation window: 15 Nov 2024 00:00 UTC through 26 Sep 2026 00:00 UTC, exclusive. The archived 0.5 BTC-base figures reconcile to the full-period research run. This presentation uses the recorded quantities, gains, losses, fees and dollar drawdown without rescaling.

Price data: COINBASE:BTCUSD spot proxy, five-minute bars. Money management uses a fixed BTC base, predetermined sizing boosts, one equal-size add and preset protective exits. Exposure can reach 4 BTC in this illustration. The source replay imposes no capital constraints or compounding. Fees are modeled at 0.03% of each fill’s notional. Gross P&L is $175,620.05, modeled fees are $20,170.95, and net model P&L is $155,449.11. Funding and slippage are excluded.

The primary replay assumes an intrabar price path. Alternate candle paths were examined, but bar-based simulation cannot establish tick-level execution equivalence. The native TradingView source has an unresolved possible look-ahead-bias warning. Previously examined periods are not an independent holdout.

Customer wallet-copy sizing is chosen separately. Historical model dollars are not a forecast for that wallet, and win rate alone does not measure risk. Actual Hyperliquid fills, fees, funding and returns will differ. Past simulated performance does not predict future results.

Grouped by final exit time in UTC; boundary months are partial. Rounded monthly values may differ slightly from the unrounded total.

Source: the supplied ETH Map R1 research package, selected candidate 2257. Its 182-trade ledger and 410-fill ledger reconcile to the figures shown here. Evaluation ends at 13 Oct 2026 00:00 UTC, exclusive.

Market data: Binance ETHUSDT perpetual futures. Five-minute confirmed decisions are replayed on native one-minute bars using an adverse-first price path. The model includes a 0.05% fee on every fill, with no funding, slippage or compounding. It does not validate account capacity, margin funding or liquidation survival. The planned risk cap is not a guaranteed maximum loss.

The rules were selected using previously examined history. Later history was reused and is not an untouched validation set; nearby filter timeframes did not reproduce the selected sizing improvement. Source Pine/live parity remains unresolved. Reconciliation checks the supplied ledgers and their arithmetic; it does not independently establish the entry signals or future live execution.

Grouped by final exit time in UTC; boundary months are partial. Rounded monthly values can differ slightly from the unrounded total.

Source: the supplied ZEC Round 4 research package, selected candidate 11908, using the Round 2 data and replay engine. The saved selected replay (path 4) reconciles across 299 trades and 855 fills. The alternate replay (path 1) has $4,433.84 drawdown including open positions. These are not the Round 2 candidate settings.

BASE and Option A entries use the revised V9 gates. Confirmed five-minute signals are replayed on native one-minute bars. REG uses 9.60% initial target, 0.44% adverse add and 0.1875% post-add target; H1 uses 0.135% target and 0.40% add; D7 uses 0.20% target without an add. Stop distance is 16% from initial entry. No time stop or extra protection. Quantity step is 0.01 ZEC.

All modeled fill fees are included. Funding, extra slippage, compounding, account capacity and liquidation survival are not modeled. The planned basket loss cap is not a guaranteed maximum loss. History was reused during selection, so this is not unseen validation. Live execution and TradingView parity are separate from ledger reconciliation. Evaluation ends at 13 Oct 2026 00:00 UTC, exclusive.

0.05% fee per fill; no explicit slippage or funding. Native one-minute adverse-first replay. Quantity step 0.1 XRP and tick 0.0001 in research; live venue filters differ. Entry model uses the known five-minute close; live orders use actual fills. Stop distance 3.75%; targets 2%, 1.2% or 0.6% from frozen entry conditions. The selected replay uses Radar pre2 protection, correcting the transfer document’s cross wording.

No account-capacity, margin, liquidation or compounding constraints were modeled. The planned risk is not a guaranteed loss cap. Native chart history and live fills can differ from this saved research ledger.